完善资料让更多小伙伴认识你,还能领取20积分哦, 立即完善>
使用N5230c VNA,我在1 MHz范围内执行线性和分段S21测量,以6 GHz为中心。
起始和终止频率相同; 但是,分段扫描有几个段,每个段具有不同的间距。 存在全局相移,使得线性扫描的相位比分段扫描低0.05度。 注意,采用分段扫描使得频率从一个段到另一个段增加。 通过采取一系列线性扫描获取“分段扫描”时,这种小偏移也是可见的,每次线性扫描频率更高,并且在软件中将它们拼接在一起(效率不高,但在我进行分段清扫工作之前使用简单代码进行快速测试 )。 相位从一个段到另一个段随机移动。 这是校准错误吗? 在同一范围内似乎不太可能。 这次全球相移的起源是什么? 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 Using a N5230c VNA, I perform both a linear and a segmented S21 measurement over a 1 MHz span, centered near 6 GHz. The start and stop frequencies are the same; however, the segmented sweep has several segments, each with different spacing. There is a global phase shift such that the linear sweep is 0.05 degrees lower in phase than the segmented sweep. Note that the segmented sweep is taken such that the frequencies increase from segment to segment. This small shift was also visible when acquiring a "segmented sweep" by taking a series of linear sweeps, each successively higher in frequency, and stitching them together in software (not efficient, but a quick test using simple code before I had segmented sweeping working). The phase shifted randomly from segment to segment. Is this a calibration error. It seems unlikely over the same span. What is the origin of this global phase shift? |
|
相关推荐
1个回答
|
|
段扫描始终处于“步进扫描模式”;
除非您使用1kHz或更低的IF BW,或明确调用阶梯扫描,否则您可能会在线性扫描模式中看到一种众所周知的称为“IF延迟”的效应。这些测量的IF BW是什么; 虽然在这里,你正在使用的FW转速是什么?还有其他问题,包括扫描动力学。 如果您发布保存状态(每个条件保留一个通道),可能更容易确定差异。例如,您是否对每个状态使用相同的校准,或者您是否为每个状态单独获取校准 ? 功率是否相同,衰减器设置等0.05度相移很难在任何均匀的情况下准确辨别。 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 segment sweep is always in "stepped sweep mode"; Unless you are using an IF BW of 1kHz or less, or explicitly invoke stepped sweep, it maybe be that you are seeing a well known effect called "IF delay" in the linear sweep mode. What is your IF BW for these measurements; and while were at it, what is the FW rev you are using? There could be other issues as well, including sweep dynamics. If you post a saved state, which a channel in hold for each of you conditions, it might be easier to ascertain the difference. For example, do you use the same calibration for each state, or do you acquire a calibration for each on independently? Is the power the same, attenuator settings, etc. 0.05 degrees phase shift is very difficult to discern accurately in any even. |
|
|
|
只有小组成员才能发言,加入小组>>
1327 浏览 0 评论
2394 浏览 1 评论
2213 浏览 1 评论
2084 浏览 5 评论
2971 浏览 3 评论
1224浏览 1评论
关于Keysight x1149 Boundary Scan Analyzer
781浏览 0评论
N5230C用“CALC:MARK:BWID?”获取Bwid,Cent,Q,Loss失败,请问大佬们怎么解决呀
1024浏览 0评论
1328浏览 0评论
小黑屋| 手机版| Archiver| 电子发烧友 ( 湘ICP备2023018690号 )
GMT+8, 2025-1-12 00:06 , Processed in 1.223690 second(s), Total 76, Slave 60 queries .
Powered by 电子发烧友网
© 2015 bbs.elecfans.com
关注我们的微信
下载发烧友APP
电子发烧友观察
版权所有 © 湖南华秋数字科技有限公司
电子发烧友 (电路图) 湘公网安备 43011202000918 号 电信与信息服务业务经营许可证:合字B2-20210191 工商网监 湘ICP备2023018690号