Xilinx FPGA的命名法

开发板的命名随着时间的推移而发生了变化。
在过去几代中，命名已经过去了
Virtex-5：ML5xx
Virtex-6：ML6xx
Spartan-6：SP6xx
Artix-7：AC7xx
Kintex-7：KC7xx
Virtex-7：VC7xx
Zynq-7000：ZC7xx
KintexUltrascale：KCUxxx
VirtexUltrascale：VCUxxx
当然，这些适用于Xilinx开发板（不是来自第三方的板）。
至于编号，跨平台可能有一些一致性;
如果它们存在的“01”板往往相当简单，“05”往往是主流的“中型”平台，“09”倾向于专注于高速收发器可视性，但我不确定是否有
一个坚实的模式（UltraScale板似乎使用1xx开始）。
或者，它可能只是“更大的数字是更复杂（因此昂贵！）板”。
Avrum
在原帖中查看解决方案



以下为原文

The naming of the development boards have changed over time. For the last few generations, the naming has been
 
Virtex-5: ML5xx
Virtex-6: ML6xx
Spartan-6: SP6xx
Artix-7: AC7xx
Kintex-7: KC7xx
Virtex-7: VC7xx
Zynq-7000: ZC7xx
KintexUltrascale: KCUxxx
VirtexUltrascale: VCUxxx
 
Of course, these apply to the Xilinx development boards (not boards from 3rd parties).
 
As for the numbering, there may be some consistency across platforms; the "01" boards if they exist tend to be fairly simple, the "05" tend to be the mainstream "medium sized" platform and the "09" tend to focus on high speed transceiver visibility, but I am not certain if there is a solid pattern to this (the UltraScale boards seem to use start at 1xx). Or, it may just be "the larger number is the more sophisticated (hence expensive!) board".
 
Avrum
View solution in original post

@tkganeshbhattk，
检查以下论坛帖子：
https://forums.xilinx.com/t5/General-Technical-Discussion/nomenclature-of-Xilinx-FPGA/td-p/27338
https://forums.xilinx.com/t5/General-Technical-Discussion/How-to-read-and-Understand-the-xilinx-part-numbers-and/td-p/358531
--Syed
--------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------请注意 - 请标记答案
如果提供的信息有用，请“接受为解决方案”。给予您认为有用并回复导向的帖子。感谢Kudos .------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
-------------------



以下为原文

@tkganeshbhattk,
 
Check the following forum thread:
https://forums.xilinx.com/t5/General-Technical-Discussion/nomenclature-of-Xilinx-FPGA/td-p/27338
 
https://forums.xilinx.com/t5/General-Technical-Discussion/How-to-read-and-Understand-the-xilinx-part-numbers-and/td-p/358531
 
--Syed
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kindly note- Please mark the Answer as "Accept as solution" if information provided is helpful.

Give Kudos to a post which you think is helpful and reply oriented.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

开发板的命名随着时间的推移而发生了变化。
在过去几代中，命名已经过去了
Virtex-5：ML5xx
Virtex-6：ML6xx
Spartan-6：SP6xx
Artix-7：AC7xx
Kintex-7：KC7xx
Virtex-7：VC7xx
Zynq-7000：ZC7xx
KintexUltrascale：KCUxxx
VirtexUltrascale：VCUxxx
当然，这些适用于Xilinx开发板（不是来自第三方的板）。
至于编号，跨平台可能有一些一致性;
如果它们存在的“01”板往往相当简单，“05”往往是主流的“中型”平台，“09”倾向于专注于高速收发器可视性，但我不确定是否有
一个坚实的模式（UltraScale板似乎使用1xx开始）。
或者，它可能只是“更大的数字是更复杂（因此昂贵！）板”。
Avrum



以下为原文

The naming of the development boards have changed over time. For the last few generations, the naming has been
 
Virtex-5: ML5xx
Virtex-6: ML6xx
Spartan-6: SP6xx
Artix-7: AC7xx
Kintex-7: KC7xx
Virtex-7: VC7xx
Zynq-7000: ZC7xx
KintexUltrascale: KCUxxx
VirtexUltrascale: VCUxxx
 
Of course, these apply to the Xilinx development boards (not boards from 3rd parties).
 
As for the numbering, there may be some consistency across platforms; the "01" boards if they exist tend to be fairly simple, the "05" tend to be the mainstream "medium sized" platform and the "09" tend to focus on high speed transceiver visibility, but I am not certain if there is a solid pattern to this (the UltraScale boards seem to use start at 1xx). Or, it may just be "the larger number is the more sophisticated (hence expensive!) board".
 
Avrum

谢谢你的回复很多



以下为原文

Thanx a lot for the reply

谢谢..



以下为原文

Thank you..