完善资料让更多小伙伴认识你,还能领取20积分哦, 立即完善>
大家好!
我最近有幸能够部署带有两个K2卡,VMware 6.0和XenDesktop / XenApp 7.6的Dell 720。 我必须承认,我对这个组合的表现印象深刻。 它不会击败定制的四路SLI装备,但对于企业/商业环境来说,它非常棒。 我的问题是,有没有人在两张不同的卡片之间有性能规格(“真实世界”)? 甚至是直觉? 我们可以获得另一台服务器,并希望了解更高用户密度的K1卡的可能性。 只是看看板子的规格告诉我它会慢一些,但是如果不踢轮胎就很难知道“慢多少”。 任何信息将不胜感激! 当我刚开始搜索这些信息时,我会发布我发现的任何信息。 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 Hello All! I've recently been fortunate enough to be able to work on deploying a Dell 720 with two K2 cards, VMware 6.0 and XenDesktop/XenApp 7.6. I must admit, I am impressed with the performance I have received with this combination. It won't beat out a custom quad SLI rig, but for an enterprise/business environment, its great. My question is, does anyone have performance specs ("real world") between the two different cards? Or even a gut feel? We're in a position to get another server, and wanted to look at the possibility of K1 cards for a higher user density. Just looking at the specs of the boards tells me it will be slower, but its hard to know "how much slower" without kicking the tires. Any information would be greatly appreciated! I'll post any information I find as I go along as I'm just beginning my search on this information. |
|
相关推荐
3个回答
|
|
我会继续把它放在这里,因为它是相关和良好的信息:
http://www.nvidia.com/content/grid/resources/AutoCAD_GRID_vGPU_Scalability_Solutions_Guide.pdf 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 I'll go ahead and throw this in here as it is relevant and good information: http://www.nvidia.com/content/grid/resources/AutoCAD_GRID_vGPU_Scalability_Solutions_Guide.pdf |
|
|
|
谢谢你的轻推!
鉴于VMware和Citrix的后续更新,我们需要刷新该文档。 我们在测试中遇到的主要问题是大多数ISV,当然还有AutoCAD,缺乏一致的用户可接受阈值。 之前的所有测试都是在您引用的自定义四路SLI装备上建立最大性能,这很好,除非您现在需要知道在最终用户开始抱怨之前性能最差的情况。 参考您链接的文档,如果我们使用CADALYST作为我们的基准测试(这是一个理想的测试吗?它是用户测试AutoCAD吗?等等)那么用户不满意的索引值是多少? 下一期,您的模型与该基准测试中使用的测试有多相似? 我们继续测试和处理这些问题,但也需要您自己的结果来为我们的发现添加真实的现场数据。 如果您愿意分享此类数据,请在此留言。 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 Thank you for the nudge! Given subsequent updates from both VMware and Citrix we need to refresh that document. Our primary problem in testing, with most ISV's and certainly with AutoCAD, is a lack of agreed upon user acceptability thresholds. All previous testing has been to establish the max performance on that custom quad SLI rig you referenced, which is great except now you need to know what the least performance can be before end users begin to complain. In reference to the document you linked to, if we use CADALYST as our benchmark (And is this an ideal test? Does it test AutoCAD as a user would? Etc.) then what is the index value where users stop being happy? Next issue, how similar are your models to the tests used in that benchmark? We continue to test and work on these issues but also need your own results to add real field data to our findings. Please message me here if you would be willing to share such data. |
|
|
|
卢克,
对不起我迟到的回复,但非常感谢你回复我。 我有一些来自Uniengine和Sky Diver 1.0的基准测试。 我还有其他一些不那么详细的。 通常我会在Surface Pro 3和带有K4000卡的Dell Precision工作站上运行它们。 让我编译其中的一部分,并考虑运行CADALYST基准测试,看看我可以得到什么结果。 我会给你一个PM的联系方式。 谢谢! 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 Luke, Sorry for my late reply, but thank you so much for getting back to me. I have some benchmarks from Uniengine, and Sky Diver 1.0. I have a few others that were not as detailed as those. Typically I ran those against my Surface Pro 3 and a Dell Precision Workstation with a K4000 card in it as well. Let me compile some of that and also look into running the CADALYST benchmark and see what results I can pull. I'll shoot you a PM for contact information. Thanks! |
|
|
|
只有小组成员才能发言,加入小组>>
使用Vsphere 6.5在Compute模式下使用2个M60卡遇到VM问题
3063 浏览 5 评论
是否有可能获得XenServer 7.1的GRID K2驱动程序?
3477 浏览 4 评论
小黑屋| 手机版| Archiver| 电子发烧友 ( 湘ICP备2023018690号 )
GMT+8, 2024-11-14 13:42 , Processed in 2.799173 second(s), Total 77, Slave 62 queries .
Powered by 电子发烧友网
© 2015 bbs.elecfans.com
关注我们的微信
下载发烧友APP
电子发烧友观察
版权所有 © 湖南华秋数字科技有限公司
电子发烧友 (电路图) 湘公网安备 43011202000918 号 电信与信息服务业务经营许可证:合字B2-20210191 工商网监 湘ICP备2023018690号